Danish Neuro Single Cell (NeuSiC) platform

NeuSiC logo

The Neuro Single Cell (NeuSiC) platform provides neuroscience groups in Denmark with access to state-of-the-art single cell and spatial omics technologies (10x Genomics, Parse Biosciences, Smart-seq2).

While the user is responsible for the sample preparation (nuclei/cell isolation and potential fixation), NeuSiC covers library generation, sequencing and data analysis. Users are only responsible for covering the expenses for reagents used in library preparation and sequencing, while the working hours are fully subsidized.

The NeuSiC platform is specialized in processing brain tissue from animal models or human samples, as well as other tissues or in vitro models from neuroscience-oriented projects. We are situated at the Biotech Research and Innovation Center (BRIC) in Copenhagen and collaborate closely with BRIC’s Single Cell Core Facility.

 

The service offered includes all work from library preparation to data analysis, and consists of the following blocks:

  1. Preparation of single cell/spatial libraries
  2. Sequencing (Illumina NovaSeq6000)
  3. Data analysis

User can choose either block 1 only, block 1 and 2, or block 1, 2 and 3.

Users are responsible for nuclei/cell isolation and fixation. Fixation allows for storage of nuclei suspensions and provides a more practical experimental workflow. This option is available only when using the 10x Genomics Flex and Parse kits, but not with the 10x Genomics Universal 3' or 5' kit. For the latter nuclei/cells must be isolated and delivered to our facility on the same day, limiting it to 2–4 samples per day.

Additional information about selecting the appropriate technology is available on the subpage TECHNOLOGIES.

Offered technologies

Single cell omics
Spatial omics

Data analysis

There will be two rounds of data analysis. In the initial round, all data from standard pipelines is delivered (specific requests can be discussed in an initial meeting), including an interactive application for the user to assist with further data analysis (example on youtube).

In the final round user-specific adjustments are made and publication-ready figures are delivered.

Graph

Overview of analysis steps for single cell transcriptomics data.

The raw sequencing data is transformed into count matrices. After quality control and normalization, the samples are integrated and visualized in a UMAP graph. This is followed by cluster estimation and cell type annotation. Standard downstream analysis includes compositional analysis, differential gene expression analysis and gene set enrichment analysis. Additional analyses are available upon request. Figure created with biorender.com.

Standard analysis pipeline for small-scale single cell omics

See also our github repository for example code and plots: https://github.com/NeuSiC/scRNAseq_R_code

1) Raw data processing
  • generate fastq files
  • produce count matrices
  • initial quality control of sequencing and cell calling
2) Quality control of cells (CRMetrics)
3) Initial data analysis (conos)
  • normalization, pre-processing (pagoda2)
  • integration of different samples/conditions
  • dimensionality reduction
  • clustering
4) Cell type annotation
  • automated cell type annotation
  • or optional performed by user
5) Differential analysis (cacoa):
  • Compositional changes (example)
  • Transcriptomic expression shifts (example)
  • Inspection of sample differences (example)
  • Differentially expressed gene analysis (example)
  • Genes set enrichment analysis (example)
Additional analysis (user-specific)

More analysis tools are available upon request.

 

 

Users are only responsible for covering the expenses for reagents used in library preparation and sequencing, while the working hours are fully subsidized.

10x Genomics Universal 3’ Gene Expression (v3.1)

4 samples

8 samples

16 samples

Reagents and consumables

50.476 DKK

100.952 DKK

201.904 DKK

Sequencing 20.000 reads/cell x 10.000 cells (kit + machine time)

23.400 DKK

39.600 DKK

69.300 DKK

 

10x Genomics Flex Gene Expression

4 samples

16 samples

64 samples

256 samples

Reagents and consumables (including fixation)

56.500 DKK

138.000 DKK

313.000 DKK

830.000 DKK

Sequencing 10.000 reads/cell x 10.000 cells (kit + machine time)

23.400 DKK

39.600 DKK

114.000 DKK

342.000 DKK

 

Parse Evercode

WT Mini kit

WT kit

WT Mega kit

 cells/nuclei per kit

10.000 - 20.000 (up to 12 samples)

100.000 (up to 48 samples)

1.000.000 (up to 96 samples)

Reagents and consumables (without fixation*)

35.300 DKK

79.400 DKK

141.500 DKK

Sequencing 30.000 reads/cell (kit + machine time)

23.400 DKK

39.600 DKK

342.000 DKK

*Price of reagents for fixation of cells or nuclei depends on number of samples to be loaded on Parse kit, should be estimated separately (fixation of 1 sample: 300 DKK).

 

 

In single-cell transcriptomics, careful experimental design is crucial to minimize batch effects and confounding factors that could lead to spurious clustering and mask the true biological signal. Ensuring an adequate number of samples and incorporating appropriate controls tailored to your research question is equally important to generate robust and interpretable data.

This guide provides key considerations for designing your single-cell experiment. We do not take responsibility for the completeness of the information provided. Always adapt your experimental design to the specifics of your study.

What is a batch effect?

A batch effect refers to systematic differences in your data caused by technical factors rather than biological variation. These effects can arise due to:

  • Differences in sample preparation protocols
  • Optimize your sample preparation protocol and maintain consistency! Always use the same reagents and equipment.
  • The person performing the sample preparation
  • Ideally, a single person should handle all samples to minimize variability.
  • The day of sample preparation
  • Process as many samples as possible per day to reduce variability across batches.

Some batch effects are unavoidable, such as those caused by processing samples on different days or involving multiple individuals in sample preparation. To mitigate their impact, it is essential to:

  • Record all batch-related variables (e.g. date, operator, reagent lot numbers).
  • Ensure a balanced experimental design, distributing conditions (e.g. treatment, genotype) and biological covariates (e.g. sex, age, post-mortem interval) evenly across batches.
  • Address batch effects during data analysis if necessary.

How to design your single-cell experiment:

  1. Define sample groups and controls
    • Determine the number of samples per group based on your research question.
    • Ensure appropriate controls (e.g., age-matched samples).
  2. Identify key biological covariates
    • Common covariates include sex, age, treatment, genotype, and post-mortem interval (for human samples).
  3. Plan sample preparation to minimize batch effects
    • Distribute covariates evenly across batches.
    • Avoid processing only control samples on one day or all younger samples first.
    • Create a sample processing schedule and document it for downstream analysis.

By carefully planning and recording your experiment, you can reduce batch effects and improve the reliability of your single-cell data.

 

 

Our in-house protocols for nuclei preparation

Protocols for nuclei/cell fixation are available on the companies webpages

 

 

 

 

 

Contact us 

Mail: neusic@bric.ku.dk 

Address

BRIC - Biotech Research & Innovation Centre
Ole Maaløes Vej 5
DK-2200 Copenhagen
Khodosevich group office space (building 3, 4th floor)

Funding

NeuSiC is funded by the Lundbeck Foundation.

We ask that users acknowledge the NeuSiC facility in all scientific publications, presentations, posters or any other public announcement that reference data generated here.

Advisory board

We receive support from an advisory board consisting of:

  • Prof. Ana Pombo, MDC, Berlin/John Hopkins, USA
  • Prof. Igor Adameyko, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
  • Prof. Goran Karlsson, Lund University, Sweden
  • Assoc. Prof. Jean-Francois Perrier, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Jan Egebjerg, Lundbeckfonden, Senior Vice President, Grants & Prizes, Director of Science

People

Konstantin Khodosevich
Professor, Scientific Head of Facility

Irina Korshunova
PhD, Manager of Facility

Laura Wolbeck
PhD, Computational staff scientist

Eman Ahmad Mouhammad
Wet lab staff scientist